How to Find Willingness to Pay Without Burning Leads
“We’re launching an Enterprise tier.
If we price too low, we give away margin.
If we price too high, we stall deals.
I don’t want to experiment on my pipeline.”
That instinct is right. Most teams try to learn price inside live deals, where every answer is shaped by politics, timing, and leverage.
Pricing isn’t mysterious. It’s just often handled in the wrong place, with the wrong goal, talking to the wrong people.
Pricing should be treated as a learning problem.
The bad assumption under most pricing talks
A lot of pricing work starts from a quiet belief:
Willingness to pay is a number buyers already know, and you just need to get them to say it.
That belief leads teams to:
ask prospects what they would pay
run hypothetical surveys
treat negotiation outcomes as data
All three fail in the same way: they confuse talk with decisions.
Willingness to pay isn’t a preference. It’s a decision line.
You only see it when a real buyer with real budget authority faces a real trade-off under real constraints. Anything else is speculation.
Why pipeline feedback is structurally noisy
Sales feels like the obvious place to learn price. It’s also the most distorted place to do it.
Every sales conversation includes:
power dynamics
relationship management
strategic posturing
incentives to misrepresent
When someone says “that’s expensive,” it might mean:
I don’t control the budget.
I’m setting up room to negotiate later.
I need cover inside the company.
I don’t see the value yet.
Or, yes, it’s too expensive.
In a live deal, you can’t separate those signals while still trying to close.
Sales conversations are built for agreement, not truth.
So when a team says, “We’ll start high and negotiate down,” what they’re really doing is letting biased interactions shape their pricing logic.
That isn’t discovery. It’s drift.
Price discovery vs. value extraction
These are different jobs. Mixing them ruins both.
Price discovery is learning:
the cost of doing nothing: keep the base case, wait, or invest now
where decision lines sit
which price models and price points change approvals
when governance and process kick in
Value extraction is:
what value you create for the customer (more X, less Y)
the path you use to capture that value creation over time
whether the business produces positive financial throughput
the break-even point that shows when you’ve hit the critical mass to raise and scale
Price discovery tells you how the buying decision works.
Value extraction turns that into a system that pays.
Do them at the same time and you get stories instead of signal.
Advertisement
The role problem
In enterprise, the person reacting to price is often not the person who can approve it.
Most deals involve:
users
champions
sponsors
budget owners
procurement
legal
Only a small slice of that group creates the real decision line.
Teams usually interview whoever is easiest to reach:
the most available
the most enthusiastic
the least risky
That’s why pricing “feedback” contradicts itself.
Price sensitivity without price authority is noise.
Stop asking “What would you pay?”
It’s the most common pricing question and one of the least useful.
It invites anchoring, hypotheticals, and negotiation behavior.
Ask this instead:
At what point does this decision change form?
Enterprise buying is threshold-based. Small changes can flip the process.
A €49k decision and a €51k decision are not close if one is a quick sign-off and the other triggers procurement, legal, and weeks of delay.
A real example
A SaaS company launched an Enterprise tier. The internal debate was predictable:
“Enterprise buyers can pay more than we think.”
“If we go too high, everything slows down.”
They didn’t test on active deals. They stepped outside the pipeline.
They ran blind, third-party calls with procurement leaders and budget owners in their target sector. Not customers. Not prospects. People who approve similar purchases every week.
They didn’t ask, “What would you pay?” They asked:
At what spend level does this require escalation?
What amount can you approve without discussion?
What triggers board involvement?
The line was clean:
below $50k: automatic sign-off
above $50k: friction, delay, internal politics
They priced at $49k.
Deals didn’t just close. They closed faster.
That wasn’t clever pricing. It was clean learning.
Why this approach works
Because the learning happened:
outside live deals
without negotiation incentives
with people accountable for budget decisions
Principle: do learning where failure is cheap. Do selling where confidence is high.
Price learning does not belong in:
deals that keep the quarter alive
strategic accounts
active negotiations
It belongs where:
nobody is trying to win
nobody needs to posture
nobody is protecting future leverage
Three ways to learn willingness to pay without burning leads
1) Map decision thresholds, not “the right number”
Stop chasing a single price. Map approval mechanics.
Ask:
What spend level changes who gets involved?
What amount requires written justification?
Which purchases are routine vs. exceptional?
You’re learning governance, not preference.
2) Move learning outside your pipeline
When internal conversations are biased, step outside.
Third-party interviews remove:
relationship pressure
future discount games
politeness
People are more direct when:
they don’t need you
they won’t buy from you
their reputation isn’t on the line
Yes, it costs money. Being underpriced for years costs more.
3) Treat price as a falsifiable assumption
Instead of “let’s see what happens,” define the test.
Pick:
a target price
a success rule
a kill rule
Example: “If fewer than 30% of qualified buyers accept without escalation, we revisit.”
Now you’re testing a claim, not defending a number.
Why “start high and negotiate down” is lazy
You’ll hear: “Enterprise buyers can pay more than you think.”
Sometimes true. Often missing the point.
High prices don’t just test budget. They test:
internal effort
political capital
time cost
risk tolerance
Many deals die because approval is too hard, not because the price is “wrong.”
Speed is part of what customers buy.
Pricing is a constraint, not a late tweak
Pricing decides:
who can buy
how fast they can buy
who gets pulled into the decision
how risky the purchase feels
A price that maximizes margin can still damage:
adoption
expansion
references
That’s why pricing sits with market choice, positioning, and customer definition—not as a last-minute commercial adjustment.
A simple mental model
Willingness to pay has three layers:
Economic value: what this saves or makes
Budget authority: who can approve, and under what conditions
Governance friction: what process the price triggers
Most teams obsess over layer one. Layers two and three decide whether the deal moves.
The real risk
The biggest risk isn’t picking the wrong number.
It’s anchoring your company to the wrong logic.
A guess turns into policy. Then into targets. Then into identity. Then it becomes hard to change.
That’s why early price discovery matters—not to squeeze revenue today, but to avoid years of bad decisions later.
Closing
If you’re afraid to “test pricing” in your pipeline, don’t.
Separate the work:
price discovery: where you learn
value extraction: where you sell
Willingness to pay isn’t revealed by persuasion. It shows up in how real decisions get made.
Learn that first. Then charge with confidence.
